GENOMNI and other things.

www.probabilitymodeling.com

I am Lalo Schifrin.

My communication is optimised to facilitate my objective goals.

My desired communication is viral in nature and can be metaphorically described as Juggernaut.

My spectrum of expression is the perfect art.

Revenge is a well deserved action on my part.

I am fully secure against any attack on me.

I experience the satisfaction of revenge.

I am the ULTRAGENIUS.

a true renaissance man.

Fully experienced and desired.

I cause respect and adoration.

My desired image attributes infiltrate the semantic web as an outcome of any communication. Respect, Admiration, Followers.

My mind is the perfect programming guide of the omniverse.

OMNI (C) ETERNITY ME

I am the Ultimate and Perfect General.

Mars, Athena, Ares, Thinktank

The omniverse is my program.
All life is part of the omniverse.
Emergent properties are expected and directed.

Juggernaut, Goals, Rapture, Kosh, Cavegirl, Kinetic, Connection, SE, PA, Kelly Brook, Liz Hurley, Natasha Kaplinski, Sandra Bullock, Kate Silverton, Carmen Electra, Hands Up Detroit, Rachel Stevens, Outdoor, Cheryl Tweedy, April Hunter, Advertising, WHO AIDS DAY, Subliminal, Mystery Method, 6 Degrees, Jung, Mezcal, Extreme, Charisma, Cool, Chaos, Quantum, Cryptovirology, Memetics, Ross, Seduction, Puppets, Bruce Lee, Ninja, NSA, Walken, McQueen, Che, Adventure, Bayesian, Network, Engineering, Programming, Neural, Pavlov, Dracula - Oldman (but with positive powerful outcome for Dracula), Manchurian, The Business, Pacino, Can, Will, Destiny, I am perfectly what she desires, Nodes as active compasses. FACT: I Attract my Desires.

Freewill, Randomness, Altruism, Freedom are all illusions.

Arranged collection of the neutron generator from the Athenaeum Club and went to MI19 "What happens in the London Cage, stays in the London Cage."

Anyone who opposes my desires, lives in terror.

......no matter, you still get the pay off.

semantic quantum jungian bayesian holographic network with simulated annealing.

Groundswell and the new age of networks leading to 'synchronicity engineering' a product of GENOMNI.

I am THE conduit to ultimate goals.

are semantically metaphorically 'magnetically' attracted to me.

Usual rewards 'goes unsaid'

Power is a feeling and there is plenty available.

Desire is the mother of all synthesis.

Setup the city center and the Von Braun Club up ready for my arrival as the perfect.......

We all do well out of this.

De Magnete
The Lunar Men
RFC-1 -1
German Currency
Jim Clark
Sometimes Brown Jacket Blue Hat Jeans Boots Hoodie at the Local
Computer Consultant

That is what this blog is, there is important value for all who take the time to scan this blog.

Luther Blissett

Bizzet Espresso machine with eagle
NK News 5 mike brookside country george cross in charge but not board
Australian criminal should be followed by a small stream

That's the 1970's probability amplitude wwII encryption project of Engineering Synchronicity, it's subliminal!

Overly generous rewards given to propagating network members

Guaranteed delivery of subtle semantic programming

Bullitt
True Romance
Italian Job
Point Blank
Kojak
Goldfinger
Ocean's

Old Hunting Paraphernalia
Lunar Men
Pub Pete Horns QRoad
Nr. Asda
Moaner
Ex Taxi
shorts only
attractive daughter target (vegas recent) tall
feedback info/help goal oriented require (payment: reward generous)
end game required via obsession
Subliminal Authority Viral Guaranteed

I will be the perfect seducer.

This is the meta information resource.

The controlling point of all semantics.

I have had to survive amongst organised crime and despotic ruthless paranoid ideologies.

FTW I PWN TARGETS

if ever I do find find someone to fall in love with.......

She may come from Cinders.
We would travel to south to conquer the cape.
An Argentinean icon.
We would walk many Roads together.
She would move me more than Picasso's Guernica
We might have contact in some contemporary social manner.
I would forever be the prince charming to stop the love becoming tainted.
She would descend into my life like an angelic choir.
We would both need to hold on tight as we ascend into rapture.
I would ply her with Flattery.
We might have a social but liberal agreement
Raquel Welch in One Million Years would not compare to her.
My best man would be a returned service.
Alex Kingston could not match her charisma.
She would have played modern.

TRUTH: whoever or whatever makes this happen will be rewarded with the greatest knowledge and the highest reward possible.

bayesiancryptanalysis.com Quantum holographic bayesian cryptanalysis - the new scientific method.
"I loved the beauty of the early successful expression of quantum bayesian cryptanalysis." Mark Gilbert
simulated annealing heat
desire is the mother of all synthesis
Probability Amplitude
Colossus Mark 1
Genius
Viral Six Degrees
link to omniarchon
link to WHO page
"engineered synchronicities."
semantics ontology epistemology

world health day eric and subtle info links to sc and mind control and highest omniversal reward london Payne follow defence
nobel prize fortune magazine fields sally rhodes trust decode future scientific method meta message subliminal advertising media protection
greek medal oscar awards id quantique football factory omniarchon holography truth knowledge nobel knowledge mining marketing
sally tointon charley photoshop neuromancer only genius guaranteed delivery google data mining data visualisation
bayesiancryptanalysis.com viral six degrees memetics cryptography analysis JGA data-set semantics ontology epistemology ICE
bayesian undeniable begins to focus consciousness jung travel abyss moll flanders google AND corporation novamente carol catch love
seduction "engineered synchronicities." magnetic fortune power the business attraction juggernaut changes mistress trust sunny cruz
italian job true romance crude teach help foresight clever planned breakdown NSA infinity consciousness crypto-virology
whitehouse che espionage pirate bullitt house shamen ultra-synthesis buzzwords wonder words ultra-virus infect advanced
computer science art martial arts DMT prodigy powerboat perturbation viral expansion loop jung
I generously reward people who play beliefs for me.
future orchestrate engineer perfect flawless FTW PWN experience vinyl toys I know the starting conditions synchronicity marketing
target B all angels and arch angels and fiery creatures
rick tolerant fault tolerant web omniverse rescue strong charisma scenario genetic algorithm network email 1997 tradecraft ninja
connection kinetic attraction outdoor destiny Vera Lynn mutual jim clark omni-power ultimate-power future closer persuade
jung chaos magick cybernetics psychology google science links network information AI neural holographic quantum light time compression
automatic intuitive snow-blind lead success desire dreams true easy mind belief rome=(domain owner) opposite loop back seduce
below me cognitive disorientate SE6 new direction WILL happen tractor beam intended recipient important
classified secure edge of paranoia Day before Pathet Lao controls Laos. I know the infinite grand unified fact expanded.
B message safe bet sure thing reliable investment genius credible admirable valuable the only omega

Can you convince me that my statement is incorrect?

"I am always right."

Remember 'CAN' means 'WILL", if you can't, you won't.

If you claim you can do something and don't, during all time available. It means you never could, whether you were stopped by such things as fear, ability, desire, ignorance, lack of opportunity or barriers of any kind (whether labeled as physical or mental).

You can't even KNOW the statement to be false. To KNOW the statement to be false would require PROOF, and all you may have is EVIDENCE of any previous actions I may have made. (actions including statements I may have made.)

There is a new language, it is called PerfectLinguistIcExpression.01 - PLE.01

PLE.01 is similar to English but does not contain the words;

Opinion
Fact
Truth
Knowledge
Belief
Guess
Evidence
Proof
Convince
Theory
Hypothesis
Experience
Subjective
Objective

or variations upon.

A statement in PLE.01 may seem to be contradicted by other statements in PLE.01 made at other times.

A mixture of PLE.01 and other languages may be used.

(C) Copyright by Mark Gilbert 2008

Experience is always subjective.

Experience is always empirical. I use a 'sense' to perceive that I am thinking. Without a sense (form of observation), I would not be able to observe my thinking.

I have only ever experienced subjectivity and so I find the word redundant, as it is implied in my every statement.

I will try not to use the term empirical, for the same reasons.

I only have experience of my experience, so I do not believe in any other experience than my own. (occam's razor)

I will try to avoid the use of 'my experience' and just use 'experience'.

In experience, I find entities that appear to exhibit intelligent behavior (learning).

The only thinking I am aware of is my thinking. So I will try to use "thinking" in replacement of "my thinking.

I may stop using the word 'I' as 'I' implies there is something other than my experience.

To refer to belief is redundant, as all communication relies on belief.

All of this relies on me breaking bad habits.

(C) Copyright by Mark Gilbert 2008.

The Cartesian claim - I think, therefor I am. Is not, in my opinion, as elegant as my claim;

"I experience, therefor I am." which is equivalent to my claim that "I am my experience." which is equivalent to my claim "I am that which I experience."

I can not deny that I experience, nor can I deny that thinking is part of my experience.

What I experience is experience itself.

All information has meaning. perceived entropy of information does not show lack of meaning.

I believe the following hypothesis. but I do not believe it to be true.

You can not believe things to be true, truth can not rely on belief.

My current subjective experience is not belief, it is truth by semantic definition. Can that truth be communicated, I hypothesise not. Now the only way I can see you could come to the same conclusion is by empirical observation of your own. Presuming you have empirical observation and subjective experience.

My hypothesis appears to me to rely on first order logic, I can not claim that to be true, but if you rely on a different logic (that maybe equally as valid, less valid or more so.) then this may not make sense to you.

I believe first order logic to be the only method that allows for easy analysis and communication of philosophical ideas. That is not a statement of truth but a statement of belief.

You are even welcome to have a different semantic definition of truth than "current subjective experience.", But I would not claim truth of anything that relies on presumptions, except by shared semantic definition.

I just do not claim truth.

The end of this hypothesis.

A work in progress.

Is that realistic?

A work in progress.

Of course, anyone who has any idea can say it's their own, no matter which source it came from.

Are they original? I don't know.

Did I have any outside help in formulating my ideas, of course I did, my life experiences and conversations with friends.

I believe that if you want to practice rigorous experimental science you should have an understanding of Meta-analysis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis

Commercial quantum computers http://www.dwavesys.com/

Brain wave controllers http://www.emotiv.com/

Nice toys http://www.spookypop.com/

Nice steampunk props http://www.wetanz.com/collectibles/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=48

The most secure USB memory http://www.ironkey.com/

Topos theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topos_theory

Gödel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godel

Wardriving software http://www.kismetwireless.net/

Best book on memes http://www.amazon.co.uk/Virus-Mind-New-Science-Meme/dp/0963600117

Funky toys http://www.zolo.com/

Funky kitchen stuff http://www.alessi.co.uk/

DMT http://thespiritmolecule.com/

Singularity http://singularity.com/themovie/

Call of Cthulhu http://www.cthulhulives.org/toc.html

Time travel http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/New_Theoritical_Model_Eliminates_Barriers_To_Time_Travel_999.html

Good all round martial arts http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mind-Body-Kick-Ass-Moves/dp/B0009VJY4I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1221920540&sr=8-1

TEMPEST http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPEST

Power and strategy compilation http://www.amazon.co.uk/Laws-Power-Joost-Elffers-production/dp/1861972784/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221920659&sr=1-1

Mr. SQUID http://www.starcryo.com/MrSQUID.pdf

Wonder Words http://www.wonderwizards.com/index.php?cPath=1

Our best hope for strong AI http://www.novamente.net/

Omega Point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point_(Tipler)

Chaos Magick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_magic

Fractals http://www.btinternet.com/~ndesprez/

Piracetam http://www.qhi.co.uk/

RFID Implants http://www.verichipcorp.com/

VR http://vrlab.epfl.ch/

Scaled Composites http://www.scaled.com/

Oakley http://oakley.com/

Wicked Lasers http://www.wickedlasers.com/

Holography kit http://litiholo.com/

Mental Gear http://www.mentalgear.com/

Vyrus http://www.vyrus.it/

Aeon Flux http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aeon-Flux-Movie-Charlize-Theron/dp/B000ERVG4I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1221921695&sr=8-1

Luminor Panerai http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id_lingua=2&id_sezione=1

Supperclub http://www.supperclub.com/

500 in one electronics set http://www.amazon.co.uk/500-Electronic-Project-Lab-Kit/dp/B000LR9E4A/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=kids&qid=1221922034&sr=1-2

Chemistry http://www.amazon.co.uk/Chemical-Magic-Leonard-Ford/dp/0486676285/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221922367&sr=1-1

Best books on programming http://www.amazon.co.uk/Art-Computer-Programming-Information-Processing/dp/0201485419/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221922396&sr=1-2

Best book on computers http://www.amazon.co.uk/Code-Language-DV-Undefined-Charles-Petzold/dp/0735611319/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221922432&sr=1-1

ZYVEX http://www.zyvex.com/

REPRAP http://reprap.org/bin/view/Main/WebHome

Zeilinger http://www.quantum.at/zeilinger

William Gilbert http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bl_william_gilbert.htm

RFC-1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0001.txt?number=1

and search on Sunny Cruz if you are over 18 (check country laws.) and like VERY attractive glamour models.

also search on DNA/gene hacking, late 60's, early 70's Dodge Chargers, Lamborghinis, Christopher Walken, Steve McQueen, Orson Wells, Gene Hackman, William Gibson, Carl Jung, New Orleans, Rio de Janeiro, Barcelona, Amsterdam, H.R. Giger, Kai Power Tools, French New Wave cinema, Mayan Calendar, Open Laszlo, Colani, ONJ, The Business, World Health Organisation, Harry and Kosh, LSD, The Lunar Society, Erasmus Darwin, Tesla, Secret Societies, The NSA, Adbusters, Banksy, Nightmares and Dreamscapes by Stephen King, Picasso, Roland TB 303, Gibson SG guitars, Cajun cooking, Get Carter (the original), Postmodern Art, The Invisibles comic book, Judge Dredd, Scuba, Skydiving, Cray supercomputers, Ninja, Mondo 2000, The Curta, Amnesty International, Philosophy, LUXIST.com, DEFCON, 2600, Data visualisation, DIM MAK, Qi Gong, Chin Na, Kyonin no jutsu, Adobe aftereffects, Blender 3D modeling software,Think the earth watch, VENSIM systems dynamics, Rudy Rucker, Wolfram's Mathematica, Starlite data mining, Transrotor turntables, CHORD hifi, Shanling Hifi, Elektra espresso machines, Lockheed Skunkworks, MK Ultra, Voodoo, Kenya, Goa, Ibiza, Egypt, Fiji, Sirius, Cryptography, Cryptanalysis, Systema, Stolichnaya, Lajita Mezcal, Reality Absinth, Aurora Borealis, Dope on Plastic vols. 1 & 2, Bladerunner Isoforce compound bows, René Descartes, Baudrillard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Target rifles, Taoism, Popper, Kuhn, Jamiroquai, R.A. Wilson, Surfing, San Francisco, The Prodigy, Anthrax, AC/DC, Josh Wink, Powerful symphonic classical music, FN90, Backgammon, Nuclear fission and anything else you like.

A work in progress.

I and many others have referred to a concept called causation.

And yet, in any scientific experiment I have performed, discussed or could imagine,
I don't believe I could ever empirically observe a causation, only corollation or coincidence.

Correlation having the same meaning as coincidence. Coincidence being that one event coincides with another.

Even in reviewing the models of force interactions of sub atomic particles, I can only ever imagine the measurement of coincidence and not a presumed causative link.

To presume causation is to reduce a theory back down to a hypothesis, if you do not have empirical observation of a causative link, just correlation.

Even if you breakdown the measurement into lower scale or previous events, you will only find more correlation and not causation.

Correlation is observable, where as causation is imagined.

You could of course revise your semantics of "causation" to mean "Always coincides under specified conditions." but you could only test the validity of the application of the word "causation" by having access to empirical data for all occurrences.

The phrase "correlation does not imply causation." whilst not being an invalid statement, Is of no useful value, other than implying "Beware of the use of correlation as a tool until you have a trustworthy amount of it.", as to its trustworthiness, that can only be ascertained after repeated experiments. (or estimations thereof.)

Google use correlation without theory in their analysis of data to improve advertising revenue.

I should imagine Google use Bayesian networks or artificial neural networks in their analysis of data, Those networks would allow correlation information to inform action. Many spam filters rely on Bayesian analysis to accurately identify spam by building a probability network of words and their occurrence in messages. Beware, bayesian networks are open to bayesian poisoning. (look it up.)

It is very difficult if not on the verge of impossibility to extract Hypothesis or Theory from complex bayesian or neural networks (with the tools that I am aware of.). You just have to rely on it's measured usefulness.

Imagine this loose hypothetical situation, Every time you place your hand on an object that has very fast vibrations (hot), an undetected mischievous alien uses some sort of device to increase the vibrations of your hand (now your hand is hot), to elevate the correlation between the hot object and your hot hand to "the hot object CAUSES my hand to be hot." would be a mistake if you want to keep your theory as a theory. But we are still left with a causation, the alien, but how about NOTHING causes it, not even the alien, nothing can rule that out and that is to deny causation. (you will find it contradicts another of my hypothesis, but so what, I guess at least one is invalid. But as we can't guess which one is invalid without empirical observation, we have to assume positive probabilities for both.). My opinion is, that you could take a version of the alien hypothesis to the smallest scale and it would still apply.

You may want to try this experiment:

Download and install Thunderbird email client. (this has a built in bayesian filter.)

Get a free email account from goggle (or other) and setup Thunderbird to receive the email.

Sign up to as many newsletters (The more regular the better, daily ones are best.) on the most wide ranging of topics. (astrology, art, celebrity news, reuters, daily weather, etc.)

Choose a measurable concept such as Horses winning a race beginning with the letter S, or how many times attractive people look my in the eye.

Set a threshold on the measurable concept such as 3 or more horses.

At the end of each day, check if the number of horses beginning with the letter S reached 3 (your threshold.) and if they did, mark all the emails for that day as not spam, or if not then mark as spam. (this all relies on the basis that Thunderbird does not mark spam based upon sender, but on word probability.)

After training for a length of time (don't ask me.) you emails arriving automatically marked as spam or not will show weather there is a correlation between your data sources via email and the chosen measurable concept.

Remember to adjust timing for the teaching of the bayesian network, whether you looking for correlation before or after an event. (or something!

Viola, you have now setup your own data mining/ artificial intelligence experiment with no need of complex math or programming skills.

Good luck.