No.
I love science, I value it as my most treasured method of investigation.
But I do choose to practice science HONESTLY!
The word science is a bit of a confusion. I believe it literally means knowledge. The practice of science will no more give you knowledge than the practice of doing nothing at all.
Why?
Because science will give you models, that may appear useful, and you may come to trust those models as useful. BUT they are not knowledge. Knowledge is limited to current subjective experience, and the word current is important. See my Intelligent Being Recent Creation hypothesis, the earliest published article in my blog.
One small caveat to models not being knowledge. If you hold a part of that model in your current subjective experience, it is knowledge (knowledge is never of something, knowledge is the thing itself, so that means the knowledge you have is the part of the model, Not part of that which your model tries to describe.) so long as it remains in your subjective experience.
When people say "I have knowledge of something.", I believe they mean, they have a model or description of something. A model is never as accurate as the thing it describes until such a time as that model becomes that which it describes. A model is no longer a model when it becomes that which it describes. And so a model can NEVER be trusted 100%.
Models attempt to describe things. very important word, attempt, or you could put it, A model creator attempts to describe things.
