Could anyone seriously claim Nature is wrong?

Right are those things that happen, Wrong are those things that don't.

I don't believe in freewill as I have no evidence of freewill.

I believe I have experienced making choices (just like a computer makes
choices.) I believe I also had emotional feelings that influenced the
outcome of those choices, BUT the only evidence I could imagine of
having freewill would be to perform that choice again and again to see
if there is a different outcome AND only in the EXACT (every molecule
in nature, my memories and feelings all being the same. Obviously no
memory of making the choice previously.) same conditions as the
original choice. Also to believe in freewill would be deny causality or
at least repeatable correlation and that would mean the breakdown of
logic and science.

No freewill just can't be, In the same way randomness just can't be
(and when I say random I mean RANDOM, not a level of complexity we
can't measure because of a lack of technology. as in a casino or a
subjective interpretation of a quantum event.)

And if anyone suggested that Freewill relies on randomness. Well that
would imply a lack of any WILL at all being involved as it would be
RANDOM.

Does this suggest we have no will? Not at all, I have experienced that
which I call will, I just don't believe it is free.

My will is directed by my memories, my tastes, my values, the time, my
location, in fact the state of all of the universe which has any affect
on me. but it has never been free, only directed by the laws of nature,
which my very being, mind, emotions, experience are part of.

I don't claim to know all things that have occurred, and I certainly
don't claim to know all things that haven't occurred, How could I know
that, THEY HAVEN'T OCCURRED? :)

I am not free as to the choice of walking down the road, The mugger is
not free as to the choice of mugging, the jury is not free as to the
choice of assigning guilt to the mugger and politicians, society, media
are not free as to the choices they make that affect society and it's
laws in the future.

I do not try to impose my likes and dislikes on such absolute terms as
right and wrong, No, I leave that up to the absolute everything, that's
right, Nature as a whole. Any partition of nature that we use to define
right or wrong will be lacking. Right are those things that
happen/exist, Wrong are those things that don't.

This also implies that there is no such thing as freedom, as freedom requires freewill.

Should you find yourself in a field, on a beach or in a jail cell. In each case your very movements are not free and the reason why you find yourself in such a location has not been free.